Dbx driverack 260 waiting for flash download

DBX DRIVERACK 260 WAITING FOR FLASH DOWNLOAD SERIAL
DBX DRIVERACK 260 WAITING FOR FLASH DOWNLOAD PORTABLE

Oh what about the price? I use 1 DEQ2496 and 2 DCX2496 for my 5-way PA, and that comes to almost $900 new, but only 2 Driverack 260's would set me back $1300. What's that? Behringer has temperature and humidity compensation built in for when you're doing sweaty crowded indoor venues(raves)? Don't recall seeing that on a dbx. lol Oh and take a look at the screens on both, the Behringer screen good but the Dbx looks like a cheap car stereo.

DBX DRIVERACK 260 WAITING FOR FLASH DOWNLOAD SERIAL

Serial ports!?!? dbx, you have to be kidding! Who still has serial on their laptop? Behringer and their sh!t designs decided to use ethernet and put a flash card reader, the kind of convenience real professionals don't need. What!?, dbx's digital crossover don't have digital ins or outs? They run at 48k instead of 96k oh and the 10ms latency on dbx is no big deal, it's not much worse than Behringers 1ms latency. How about when they do something WAY better than a competitor like DBX? Seriously compare the Dbx Driverack 260 to the behringer DEQ2496 and the DCX2496. I agree that they rip off other companies, but at least they know when someone else has done it right and they couldn't do it better. I do know what a real monitor sounds like btw, I mix on B&W Nautilus 801s, NS10Ms, Alesis M1s, and Auratones. Oh, and I've been using them for about 5 years, no fire yet(maybe someone's sh!ty amp has DC issues).

DBX DRIVERACK 260 WAITING FOR FLASH DOWNLOAD PORTABLE

They've never been the most accurate but for less than 200 a pair what can you expect? I've ended up pole mounting them and use them with a 15' Dayton Reference series sub for a portable Dj rig, never heard anything close to that good in a portable set up. Later I decided to see what they sounded like bi-amped without the passive(Eaton) crossover, and that's when they really shined and are now way over 90db/w/m. I haven't heard the new 3030/3031 line, but I have owned the 2031P and at first it was worth the money I paid($170) but nothing more than that. I don't think we've tested the newer 3030 model yet, I'll take a look. The Mackie has it's own problems, the waveguide is not perfect so there's a little hiccup in the soundpower response around 1.5k where the speaker becomes more directional, and the limiter on the woofer causes the woofer to compresses nonlinearly with increased volume, but they are still a good speaker, especially if you don't crank them up. Also the amp is inferior, you can see the distortion at lower frequencies is higher than the Mackie. They did ok on the waveguide, the tweeter blends ok with the woofer, however there's a midrange peak followed by a broad dip in the upper mids, not very neutral, although better than some other studio monitors. so they're basically relying on their simulations and their ears for tweaking. The problem with speakers is it's not only electrical, there's the whole acoustical side of things, and behringer doesn't have resources such as acoustic measurement systems, anechoic chambers, laser vibrometers, calibrated listening rooms, etc. They tried to copy it, they even used the same Vifa tweeter which are fairly expensive. The Behringer truth 2020/2031 is a total ripoff of the HR824.

Dbx driverack 260 waiting for flash download